View previous topic :: View next topic |
Wile E. Coyote
In: Arizona
|
|
|
|
Mick Harper wrote: |
It is ridiculous that it stays the same, decade after decade, while life expectancy goes up and up, requiring fewer and fewer people of working age to pay for more and more old age pensioners. Who are often wealthier than they are!
|
Well spotted. In the UK it's fallen from in the 1960s about 4 working age people per pensioner to 3.6 working age people per pensioner by 2023.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
|
|
|
|
I have to say I'm mortified at your figures. In the sixties--as I recall--you weren't expected to live much beyond the retiring age (if you were a man, women retired at sixty then). Now everyone clings on to get a telegram from the Queen, including very nearly the Queen.
Can you explain it? Immigration of young people? Widening the workforce? Women not retiring at sixty? You're a chartered actuarialist with Scottish Widows, Wiley, tell all.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Wile E. Coyote
In: Arizona
|
|
|
|
Don't know, it's probably because they are keeping to roughly the same formula.
You have to keep in mind that Scandi systems and Western Europe are paying at a level (150%) above average monthly cost of living, whereas we pay (120%) above average cost of living. Still, we are more generous than the Eastern Europeans.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
|
|
|
|
Zat explains nuzzink.
"Scottish Widows? There's a lot of dead wood in your actuarial department. And by the way, I'll take a couple of the younger ones off your hands especially that sloe-eyed one in the hood. Yes, that's right, the one who got sacked when she became a cult figure and demanded a pay rise. You Scotch, careful with your money, I like that. You got taken over shortly after, as I remember."
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
|
|
|
|
Here's the weirdest thing. Peru has built the biggest, most modern airport in Latin America at vast expense. Madame El Presidente proudly cut the ribbon this very week. But her government had omitted to build any transport links between her capital and the airport and had to re-open a couple of emergency bridges over a ravine to get cars through.
What did they think an airport was for? Airplanes refuelling on their way to somewhere else? I am more than usually baffled. We do things differently here. We build, at vast expense, new links like the Elizabeth Line that aren't even needed.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Wile E. Coyote
In: Arizona
|
|
|
|
Presumably Peru didn't have 19,963 prior planning meetings.
You can always fix these things later.
They just cracked on.
Bravo. Well done.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
|
|
|
|
I agree. It's the people spending two weeks in the Arrivals Hall before heading for the Departure Lounge I feel sorry for. Not forgetting to get their Incan knick-knacks in the Duty Free shop en route.
"Nice holiday, dear?"
"Restful."
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
|
|
|
|
Do you know what gave birth to the modern consumer society? It was when (in Britain, but no doubt it was the same elsewhere) the government lifting all restrictions on credit facilities in the nineteen-fifties.
Ever since the birth of civilisation in Sumer c 3000 BC, people had to save up to buy consumer durables. That meant a life without consumer durables while you saved up for them. Once you could just sign on the dotted line, you could have the consumer durables while you saved up for them. Simple really.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
|
|
|
|
Oddly, this was the mirror equivalent of one of the greatest advances in penological practice. In 1872 the British government (but no doubt others too) abolished imprisonment for debt. HMG took the view that, as with the granting of credit, it was entirely a matter for people to sort out amongst themselves. It was no business of the state.
AE-ists should be thinking of other ways shackles can be lifted in this simple but revolutionary way. The legalisation of drugs would qualify if it hadn't already been thought of.
And areas of life where shackles might usefully be introduced, of course.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
|
|
|
|
Sorry to go on, but it fits. In the nineteen-fifties there were agonised debates about freeing up 'the never-never' as credit schemes were called. These arguments were not primarily about whether people might fall into debt-traps, things of that sort.
It was anxieties about whether the consumer-boom that was sure to follow would exacerbate British balance-of-payments problems. Britain was so ravaged by war damage, it was argued, the country could not produce even the derisory level of gadgetries that could be bought for ready cash. If Britons could buy whatever they liked, whenever they liked, our imports would skyrocket, the pound would nosedive and it would be like losing the war all over again.
It took another thirty years before it was realised this was no business of the government's either. Stuff came in, stuff went out, the floating pound took it all in its stride. It didn't matter a monkeys one way or the other.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
|
|
|
|
The average American has fewer than 3 friends. Mark Zuckerberg |
It turned out he meant 'close friends' but this widely reported claim was universally treated as somehow shaming. Each talking head I listened to gave their own hand-wringing gloss. Either it wasn't true ('Damn you, Zuckerberg') or it was true and it was all the fault of Facebook et al ('Damn you, Zuckerberg').
After I had finished saying to myself, "I should be so lucky," I reflected on my own number of close friends during the various stages of life. Which I believe to be quite normal (and as a current recluse, I understand these things better than most). I think it amounted to this
1. When you're at school/college you have one 'best friend' plus a close social circle you are both part of.
2. When you're 'in a relationship', the best friend dwindles away, you have no close social circle of your own but a looser one you and your partner are part of.
3. When you are ex-relationship, you have tenuous friendships based on holdovers from 1 and 2.
It looks a bit sparse now I come to tabulate it, but all in all Zuckerberg was about right.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
|
|
|
|
In the nineteen fifties and sixties the British government did something no other country even thought about doing. It built--at astonishingly vast expense and in an unprecedently quick time--a coupla power stations
One in Scotland and one in Wales. These were not, in the ordinary sense, hydro-electric plants. True, they had a head of water which, when released, turned turbines which fed electricity into the National Grid, but they weren't used for that. In a few hours the water would be all used up and you would either have to use even more energy pumping it up again or wait six months for nature to fill the reservoir.
I have been watching a gushing YouTube about the Scottish one. |
The dude had obviously been given official guidance all about how these were for coping with sudden peaks. Apparently, he told us, the British all make tea at the same time during halftime in important football matches.
We wouldn't be able to predict them, would we? Alternatively, they were 'giant batteries' because over-reliance on non-fossil fuels might cause problems. In the fifties and sixties? Yeah, right. For some reason he hadn't been told the actual reason.
They were built for nuclear war. |
It was pointed out by the suits of the time that a Russkie attack would take out so much of the National Grid no amount of spare capacity and multiple switching stations could save it from total breakdown. And since most of the big power stations would have gone the same way as the cities they served, there would be no way of starting it up again. Even to the sort of belt-and-braces level needed to keep civil administration going after Armageddon.
So Cruachan Power Station was built in the Scottish highlands. |
Inside a Scottish highland. It could run just long enough to kickstart the Grid. In case the Commies lobbed a few kilotons in that direction, they built Dinorwig Power Station inside a Welsh mountain, just to be on the safe side.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
|
|
|
|
When It Hits The Fan (BBC R4)
This is the weekly guide to the world of PR conducted by a coupla distinguished practitioners (though one of them is an ex-editor of The Sun). This week they were discussing how to get an honour. There are dozens of PR outfits who offer this service. It's fifty thou for a knighthood for example--that's what you pay the PR company, what you have to lob in the direction of one or other party that controls who gets an honour comes on top of that.
But due to a string of scandals, even that is no longer enough. You have to provide examples of 'good work'. That can be difficult if you're the sort of person who needs an honour to hide the villainous methods required to get shedloads of new money in Britain today. Just handing over a few million to charity is much too obvious. (Though you have to do that.)
No, you turn to a different PR company, one that specialises in connecting aspirant honour-seekers to the sort of 'good work' top people think is top work.
Claudia Winkleman among 16 new trustees at national museums
UK Government announces board appointments for British Museum, V&A and Tate Museums Museums Journal |
Such wholesale changes at the top has been found necessary after the last collection of dead wood presided over a string of scandals and had to take their K's into the sunset.
PS Does anyone have Claudia's number? I need to tell her she is in imminent peril of being arrested on a RICO charge re the string of crimes described in RevHist. And to think, I've only just escaped the clutches of Katie Razzell.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
|
|
|
|
About Time Too
I have been arguing for years that HMG and the police are stuck in an AE timewarp, concentrating on crimes they are familiar with. Meanwhile the crims have moved on apace. I also pointed out that you will never get either HMG or the police to move at any pace so it is time for citizen's action. I received this today
Hello Michael
Phone scammers are getting smarter and bolder. A big part of our role is to keep up to speed with scams and to help you avoid them. That’s why, as a partner of Stop Scams UK, we’ve joined Dial 159. It’s a quick, direct route to safety if you think you’ve had a suspicious phone call.
How does Dial 159 work? Calling 159 works in the same way as calling 101 for the police or 111 for the NHS. If you get a phone call and think someone’s trying to scam you into sending over your money or personal details, stop and hang up. Dial 159 and ask to be connected to [XXX] Bank. You’ll be connected safely and securely to one of our UK customer service team who can help right away.
A first of its kind collaboration between telecoms companies and UK banks, Dial 159 connects you safely and directly to us. It can’t be spoofed or impersonated. This means you don’t have to spend time looking up our phone number if you think you’ve been scammed. |
The truth is you can't even ring up the police any more. I spent all day trying to get through to someone, when this first happened to me, each time having to go through an enormous rigmarole, just to be palmed off onto somebody else. Nobody wanted the unsolved crime figure to go up by one on their patch. I gave up in the end. And I don't even start the process when it re-occurs, I just put the phone down. I'm sure it's a familiar enough experience.
As I have also pointed out, scammers (and internet nuisances in general) can only be dealt with at the national level and unfortunately we do not have a national police force. We do though have a national government and, I understand, there are proposals to set up a committee to consider the problem. Were proposals. Labour's in office now. They want to cut backroom staff in favour of bobbies on the beat.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|