The Causes of Temperature (Geophysics)

[Ishmael]

Something else of possible interest.

Tanzania is FULL of Albinos. I've never seen so many Albinos in all my life.

Now the thing about these Albinos is that they don't look merely like white-colored Negroes. There's always something "off" about their faces: A suggestion of broader genetic abnormality. Rarely are any of them attractive-looking: Quite the opposite.

White skin appears to be a recessive gene that expresses itself along with other recessive genes when something goes genetically wrong.

[Ishmael]

On the subject of Albinos, there was a story from a few years back that Congolese Africans were murdering Albinos due to a "rumor" that Albinos had gold nuggets inside their heads.

Where could such a rumor come from?

I can't help but wonder if there might be a connection with the original Hyperboreans.

There is, in fact, a popular idea among the alt-archeology set that "Egyptians" ingested powdered gold. If they did, is it possible that the gold dust accumulated somewhere inside their bodies?

[Mick Harper]

[Mick Harper]

[Ishmael]

[Ishmael]

[Ishmael]

[Mick Harper]

[Ishmael]

THE HYPERBOREANS: HUMAN ORIGINS PART V

The Hyperborean age, the last inter-glacial, was the age that gave rise to modern humans. It lasted eons. Uncountable time.

During that age, human beings transformed from a naked creature that could use simple throwing weapons (spears with stone tips), into fully-clothed creatures who had mastered complex weaponry and machinery with a fully-functional textile industry. How far along they got in the path of progress I can't tell you, but I err on the conservative side. The true Hyperboreans in the far north certainly mastered stellar navigation, being exposed to the stars and only the stars for six months of the year. Likely their simple religious impulses had developed into a complex theology as well. The Hyperboreans had culture.

That culture emphasized cooperation, egalitarianism, non-violence, empathy, and community. All necessary instincts for survival in the darkness of the north, even given its temperate climate. It is likely that white skin evolved there too, as all animals, when bread for docility, tend to become whiter over generations. Even snow-white (which suggests nature knows precisely where those selective pressures are likely to emerge).

These changes, taking place over eons, impacted all humans in and around the north pole, and not just the true Hyperboreans. The closer those humans lived to the pole, the more impacted they were, both culturally and genetically. My guess is that forebears of the Orientals were closest to the pole (supported by the fact that all Eskimos are Orientals), with the forebears of the European Whites (Neanderthals) a little lower down, with some overlap. Below them were the forerunners of the Arabs and, farther down still, were the sub-continental forebears (having some overlap with the Arabs). Farthest south of all, and least impacted, were the genetic stock that would later interbreed with Hyperboreans to produce the African Blacks.

Yeah. That sounds really racist. It isn't. It's just a recognition that these groups exhibit the incomplete retinue of Hyperborean characteristics given above to a varying degree that can actually be ranked, and which happens to mirror their present locations relative the north pole. A rather interesting phenomenon, I should think.

It is important to reiterate, however, that all these human group are today no less than 86% Hyperborean in origin. We are all cousins and, though we trace part of our lineage back to this less-civilized local stock, most of what we are we owe to our other parents: The Hyperboreans. This is reflected in the rather odd fact that, regardless of how uncivilized may be any given present-day peoples, we all seem to agree on what a virtuous society should look like.

That said; all these changes took place north of the equator. Exclusively north of the equator. For generations after the north became uninhabitable, the equator itself continued to prove impenetrable to the Hyperborean genome.

Millions(?) of years before, this same process had played out on a world without humans (as it had many times before). That was the world that had given rise to the Placental animals. They too had evolved exclusively in the northern hemisphere, leaving the entire southern hemisphere to the marsupials. The marsupials remained unchanged by polar conditions as, at that particular time, only the north enjoyed land-access to the poles. The marsupials in the south were unable to migrate to the south pole, it being either under water or being surrounded by an ocean moat thousands of miles in width. As a result, they were isolated from its influences and remained largely unchanged.

When the equatorial barrier broke down on that previous occasion, the Placentals managed, ultimately, to pass through. Thus began their slow conquest of the southern hemisphere, which continues to this day. Today, only the Australian continent, the most southerly land-mass, remains unconquered.

When modern humans evolved, like the Placentals, they emerged exclusively in the northern hemisphere. Any human beings that may have been present in the south were wholly isolated from these influences, cut-off from the north by the impassable torrid zone.

But were there, during that inter-glacial period, any humans isolated in the southern hemisphere?

I believe there were. And what happened to them affords the strongest evidence that all I've told you is true.

[Mick Harper]

[Mick Harper]

As I was posting up today's contribution in the Medium Fakes thread in the British History section, I realised that these dudes were playing havoc with the trees up there in Arcticland and points south. I offer them to you for your own purposes.

[Ishmael]

[Ishmael]

[Ishmael]

[Ishmael]