MemberlistThe Library Index  FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
AE on Telly News (NEW CONCEPTS)
Reply to topic Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 173, 174, 175, 176  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Ishmael


In: Toronto
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Grant wrote:
Meal Deals are the greatest ignored business opportunity in the world.

What is a Meal Deal?
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

You can rest your case, Grant.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

But to answer Ishmael's query: a Meal Deal consists of 'a main', 'a snack' and 'a drink'. I conducted some primary research on his behalf (he's in the food business himself) at Tesco during my weekly shop.

I deliberately sought the most expensive 'main', what the rest of us call 'a sandwich' and came up with Tesco Finest New York Deli-inspired Pastrami and Emmental £4.00
My favourite snack: Walker's Cheesy Wotsits grab bag £1.20
The most expensive drink: Red Bull Sugar-free Energy drink 330ml £2.35

Total: £3.50. That's why us cheapskate Brits love 'em so.
Send private message
Ishmael


In: Toronto
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Mick Harper wrote:
Total: £3.50. That's why us cheapskate Brits love 'em so.


How is the total less than the sum?
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

A Meal Deal always costs the same irrespective of the three items* you buy. £3.50 in the case of Tesco (which is about average). I don't understand the economics of it... it doesn't seem to be a loss leader.

* Not any item, they are the ones marked as 'Part of Meal Deal', though there is a vast range of each on offer.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

I Got This Today As A Netflix Flyer

Accused: The Hampstead Paedophile Hoax
TV programme

I resent their algorithm singling me out (how did it know?) but since I couldn't remember the case, I googled it

81% liked this TV show Google users
In 2015, two children accused parents and teachers of running a baby-eating satanic paedophile cult in a Hampstead school. The lurid tale gripped conspiracy theorists around the world and plagued the lives of the accused.
First episode date: 11 March 2024 (UK)

We've covered this a bit here at the AEL but I had not associated it with Hampstead. I suppose I'd better check it out. I wouldn't put anything past those Hampstead types.
Send private message
Grant



View user's profile
Reply with quote

It was somewhere in Wales, wasn't it?
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

I had it somewhere oop north. Stoke on Trent? Perhaps we all have different oop norths. The programme isn't available till Sunday so I'll report back then.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Accused: The Hampstead Paedophile Hoax (Netflix)

I'm only ten minutes in and I'm totally shocked. How come I've never heard of this? It was only 2016 for Chrissake and must have been all over the MSM. I accept I don't read the tabloids and steer clear of BBC1 and ITV1 news, but I've got a water cooler.

As for the programme itself, my jaw is thudding regularly to the floor at the sheer inanity of the principals. Both hoaxers and hoaxees. There's an hour still to go so maybe it will grow legs.

If they had a sense of humour I would suspect Netflix of pulling my leg.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

I've finished it now and it proved both less and more important than I supposed. It cleared up the mystery of why I had never heard of the Hampstead Paedophile Hoax. There were no criminal prosecutions (until much later) only Family Court proceedings (which could not be reported at the time).

First the heroes and villains:

1. There was a single (male) criminal mastermind who staged the whole thing.
2. There were two (female) patsies who caused all the trouble.
3. The mothers of the children sorted the whole thing out with remarkable tenacity.
4. The fathers of the children were nowhere to be seen.
5. There was no malpractice by police, Crown prosecutors, judges, schools etc, apart from a degree of complacent negligence.

Although it only affected a limited number of people--parents and children--in a privileged part of London, it had some wider implications that means this sort of thing might be coming to a school near you. /more
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Car Pound Cops: Give Me My Car Back! (Channel 5)

Not a vintage series in this essential genre. Too many middle-aged men placidly putting cars on tow trucks and too few middle-aged women getting aerated in the pound office about leaving their cars in front of someone's driveway for a few minutes while they popped into the hairdresser's for a quick cut and blow dry. For goodness sake.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

New ground broken on Countryfile this week. A farmer admitted he was making money. You could just see Adam Henson off camera making those palms downward movements. There is no chance of their winter fuel payments being reinstated now.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Accused: The Hampstead Paedophile Hoax II

It happened thisaway (though it's hard to believe... or all too easy to believe):

1. A child abuser moved in with a hippy-ish woman who had two children at the local primary school.

2. He trained the children to tell lurid stories of how parents at the school were satanically abusing the children there.

3. The school (very foolishly but I suppose guided by 'full disclosure') alerted all the parents.

4. The police quickly established none of it was true and they and the school, essentially, washed their hands of the whole business.

5. But (of course) someone had put it all on the internet, including school lists of children's addresses and whether their parents had been named as satanic abusers.

6. The man skedaddled, the mother said it was all true, her two children were taken into care.

7. This involved various court hearings and the mother insisted on being represented by an unqualified American woman crackpot satan-expert (this is allowed in Britain by the so-called 'Mckenzie Friend' exception) who kept the cauldron bubbling with professional zeal.

8. Meanwhile the internet (but not the MSM as far as I can tell) was going crazy since it ticked all the right conspiracy theory boxes.

9. People started to come from all over the world to harass the 'guilty parents' who hit back in fine style and forced the extremely uninterested authorities to take action.

10. Eventually the mother got nine years. Which is ludicrously long but otherwise well deserved.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

An exceptionally heartwarming ('Quiet at the back!') Countryfile was all about storks. What storks? Exactly. They haven't been seen in BBC-land for six hundred years. The last recorded one died in Edinburgh, since you ask.

But the weird thing is that, for the whole of that time, storks would fly over from the Continent but, seeing no storks here, flew back again. I find it difficult to believe but that's what they said.

So why are they being featured on Countryfile?

Because, in 2016 someone popped over to Warsaw Zoo where they keep storks that can't fly--being run over by trains was the unconvincing reason given--but can breed. Ideal for sticking in an open-topped enclosure in West Sussex and leaving nature to take its course.

Storks flocked in from the Continent as well as local DIY. Now they're everywhere. In West Sussex, but soon on an electricity pylon near you.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Two perfect encapsulations of the current Woke Wars yesterday. Listen to the first item on Radio 4's The Media Show here https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m002d11p

The newly appointed--and newly embattled--head of American public broadcasting is being interviewed. She had clearly assumed she would be given an easy ride by her counterparts at the good ol' BBC but, instead, was given a grilling as to why PBS et al were so hopelessly and haplessly left wing.

After denying there was any left bias in public broadcasting (no, really) she ended up arguing essentially that pointy-head liberals were now such an endangered species in America they needed their own subsidised network!

The other programme was the second episode of the Fare-dodgers series I have already intanced. Nothing to do with fare-dodging -- denouncing which seems genuinely interdenominational -- but one sequence was filmed in a station on the newly-named Windrush Line.

I winced.

* Nobody much minds references to The Windrush, the name of the first boat bringing West Indian immigrants to Britain.
* Nobody much minds being reminded of the 'Windrush scandals', when some of those early immigrants got some rough treatment from HMG maladministration.
* Everybody minds having to commute day after day on a railway line that insists on cramming the name of such a minute event in British history down their throat.
* Everybody knows it's the work of some crazed bunch of professional wokists who seem to believe this somehow contributes to racial harmony in Britain.
Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 173, 174, 175, 176  Next

Jump to:  
Page 174 of 176

MemberlistThe Library Index  FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group