View previous topic :: View next topic |
Wile E. Coyote
In: Arizona
|
|
|
|
The boring fella who is defo not wanting to stage a coup won.
The other fella, ie the one supported with armed security by the colourful Horațiu Potra (who is the Romanian Prighozin, ie he is organising Romanian mercenaries to fight and die in the Congo to protect Romanian mine owners) lost. Horațiu Potra was previously in the French Foreign Legion and head of security for Qatar, he has also previously been arrested and his properties raided, where cash and weaponry were found. He now appears wanted for acts of intimidation as 20 of his armed mercenaries were found with lists of prominent politicians and journalists, so they say. Anyway, out on bail.... Horațiu Potra has now gone missing.
Wiley reckons Doha is the place to look.
Whether this was a real attempt or not I have zero idea.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
|
|
|
|
The Romanians have had thirty-three years of 'boring fellas' and voted 53-47* in favour of this one being better than the second-best non-boring one. I do not say they are in error but I would like them to have had an opportunity to choose the first-past-the-first-post one. As Argentina and America have shown us, you never know where the saviour will come from. It is rarely the official loonie. Maybe the democrats will allow it next time.
* At least they did not make the 'Maduro Mistake' and declare it to be 51-49.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
|
|
|
|
Pakistan/India, Who Won?
Undoubtedly Pakistan. Why so? Well, India had put itself in the wrong from the beginning by accusing Pakistan of being 'behind' the Kashmiri killings of twenty-five Indian tourists. They had no evidence for this. Only the justification that Pakistan has 'for years' been supporting various Kashmiri separatist groups.
This is true enough in itself but the Pakistanis have (just about) done enough recently to sever ties so just bombing the shit out of Pakistan targets was not called for. But Pakistan also did its bit by making sure its retaliatory strikes were well within the local norms for what is right and proper in these circumstances.
The Pakistan military has thus undergone a sudden leap from zero to hero among Pakistanis which is a crying shame because they have been the shadow government of Pakistan ever since there has been a Pakistan and are--the real fruitcakes aside--possibly the worst government in the world.
It also means the end of any chance that Imran Khan will be freed any time soon from his unjustified life sentence. Not entirely unjustified though--when Khan was in office he did much the same to his opponents. He came to power because he was the army candidate and was thrown out of power when he turned against the army. So there is something to be said in his favour. More than something, given the way Pakistan is run.
PS None of the governments of the ex-Raj--Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and Myanmar--are great adverts for British legacy administrations.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
|
|
|
|
I have been discovering things about Baluchistan. I hadn't known, for example, that it was not directly governed by, but came vaguely under the aegis of, the British and were given the choice about their future in 1947.
They chose to be an independent Baluchistan. |
Pakistan recognised this but thought better of it a few months later and sent the army in. Whereupon Baluchistan became the largest, least populated and poorest of Pakistan's four provinces. And has remained so since.
Not much was heard from the Baluchistanis until China wanted an outlet to the Indian Ocean which meant transport links from the Chinese frontier, through Baluchistan to the Chinese-built port of Gwador on the Baluchi coast. Riding roughshod over local interests all the way.
Why do governments do this? It always stores up trouble that costs far more to put right, if it ever is put right. |
Baluchi separatist have meant this whole section of the Belt and Road Initiative has become a dead letter. China is highly vexed and keeps demanding the Pakistani army put down the separatists with Chinese ferocity. To their credit (I suppose) the army can't or won't do this.
Who is funding Baluchi separatism? The Pakistanis say India, the Chinese say America, I say it's probably both but mostly home grown, mainly from drug sales.
I am in favour of Baluchistan for the Baluchistanis, for what that's worth. |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
|
|
|
|
Ever heard of a country insisting part of it belongs to another country and that other country insisting it doesn't? It happened thisaway:
1. The border between Serbia and Croatia was fixed in the 19th century as running down the centre line of the Danube.
2. When the Serbia/Croatia war of the 1990's ended, Serbia assumed the border ran down the centre line of the Danube, as per usual.
3. Not so, said the Croats, it was fixed as running down the centre line of the 19th century Danube, not the re-engineered Danube of the twentieth century. Please can we have our 120 square kilometres of land back? It's ours according to a solomon binding treaty.
4. No, you can't, said the Serbs, and anyway what about our bits on your side of the Danube now but weren't on your side of the 19th century Danube?
5. "Oh, they're not in Croatia. That's Serbian territory as far as we're concerned. We wish you'd come and claim them because some twat has set up an independent republic of Fredonia or somesuch in one of them, knowing we can't touch him. He's a right bleedin' nuisance."
6. "Not on your nellie, smellie. If we did that, we'd be tacitly conceding your claim to the big stuff. He's your problem. Best of."
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
|
|
|
|
But don't shed too many tears for Croatia. They have a dispute with Slovenia based on the river that forms the boundary between them. But this time it is Croatia claiming the twentieth century river and Slovenia the 19th century one!
Croatia's rank hypocrisy has been compounded by first agreeing to allow the UN's Permanent Commission on Borders to decide the issue and then rejecting the ruling (they split the difference) because of pro-Slovenian bias. The UN is a nest of Slovenian sympathisers. Known for it.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
|
|
|
|
Forty per cent of undocumented migrants in America arrive legally on tourist visas. They become 'over-stayers' after six months. It is quite common for them to apply for asylum, and it is also quite common for them to be given a work permit while they wait for their asylum status. Liberal CNN talking head, re the Egyptian Colorado nutter |
I have some personal experience of this. I went to America on a six month tourist visa and, since I wanted to stay on, I took advantage of a dodge outlined in The Whole Earth Catalogue:
* You buy a full price airplane ticket from the US to your home country
* You apply for a six month extension of your tourist visa
* The geezer demands evidence you intend going home after that
* You show him your ticket
* He stamps your passport
* You cancel the airline ticket for a full refund.
However those were gentler times, when asylum-seekers were mostly Russian ballet dancers. For now I merely observe that
(a) people seeking asylum don't normally start out as tourists
(b) they aren't normally able to support themselves for six months in an expensive country
(c) any asylum system that needs to allow applicants to get a job while they decide
(d) is a broken asylum system.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|