MemberlistThe Library Index  FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Politics, The Final Frontier (Politics)
Reply to topic Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 139, 140, 141 ... 143, 144, 145  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Boreades


In: finity and beyond
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Kaja Kallas is making sure the world knows how important and relevant the EU is to events.

I have spoken with Secretary of State Marco Rubio and our Ambassador in Caracas. The EU is closely monitoring the situation in Venezuela.


Phew! What a relief, we can sleep easy tonight.

The EU has repeatedly stated that Mr Maduro lacks legitimacy and has defended a peaceful transition.


Err .. it was a "mostly peaceful" transition?

Under all circumstances, the principles of international law and the UN Charter must be respected.


And the prize for the most vacuous statement of 2026 goes to ....

We call for restraint.


Bit late for that, love.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Do you recall their attitude during the Falkland Wars? [From memory...] The 'EU' position was an uneasy mix of 'aggression mustn't pay' (support Britain) and 'colonialism mustn't pay' (support Argentina). But the individual countries took up individual positions:

* Spain was for Argentina (not for linguistic reasons but because of Gibraltar)
* Portugal was for Britain (because Spain wasn't)
* France was for Britain (but provided Exocets for Argentinian Super-Etendards)
* Germany was noticeably heads-down.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Migrancy Innovation, Malta

This should be the epicentre of Mediterranean migrant traffic but nobody heads for Malta in small boats. Dunno why, presumably it's because dark-skinned asylum-seekers get short shrift there.

Yet Malta is in desperate need of cheap labour. They've got a nil unemployment rate and jobs aplenty but they've gone quite a different route to meet their needs. They have a system where (white, but poor) people can apply for residency if a Malta employer fills in a form on your behalf. Sounds good, right?

Wrong. You have to work for that employer and nobody else (and they check) so naturally the employer treats you like shit, you've got nowhere else to go. So you stop working for them and appeal to a tribunal to allow you to work for someone else. But that'll take two years (they've made sure of that) so you end up like all the other Mediterranean migrants, either in a terrible job or begging on the beach.

Back to the drawing board.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Is it time to introduce proportional representation?

On the whole it's better to have a government with a parliamentary majority despite that meaning only a minority of citizens get the government they voted for. It means the government can carry out a coherent programme and the citizenry can either vote them out or give them another bash. That's the key thing about democracy:

It's not about getting good government, it's the ability to get rid of bad ones.

With proportional representation you get saddled with a semi-permanent government that pfaffs around. But times have changed. Consider what we've got on the horizon if we stay first-past-the-post:

* A Labour government under Keir Starmer (they won't be able to get rid of him if he's just won an election)
* A Reform government under Nigel Farage who... Gordon Bennet, who the fuck knows?
* A Tory government under the ineffable Kemi Badenoch who doesn't know herself what she'll do
* Some kind of patched-up coalition, maybe dependent on the Scots Nats.

Whereas under proportional representation we'll have... well, it's hard to say when fifty million people can, for the very first time, vote for who they want without wasting their vote, but it'll probably keep Farage out. That's not a bad result, first time out. After that, we can wait and see.

I say: Give it a whirl.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

What jolly japes. The second-ranking Tory defects to Reform. By any standards, that's epochal. Except today's standards. It's a triumph for Kemi! How do you reckon that? They mucked up the process.

By next week, people will be asking who Robert Genrick was. West Ham were in for him but he decided to stay at Lens until the summer window, I think. Unless he was that serial killer.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Private schools have been closing in droves ever since the Labour government made school fees subject to VAT. Or at least that's what they've been bellyaching about. It turns out that while private schools have been closing in droves, even more have been starting up.

Private schools are just businesses like everything else and they flourish or not depending on the product they put out. Except they aren't. They are hated by Labour-types who want nothing more than the demise of the jolly lot.

This is typical left-wing thinking. In reality private schools benefit everyone because millions of citizens are apparently happy to pay twice, once in taxes to fund state schools and again in fees to send Marmaduke and Hortensia to private ones. If private schools were abolished, we'd have a hole in the PSBR the size of HS2. (Railways are mainly for the rich, but we won't go there.)

The same situation exists in the health sector. Millions--the same millions, by and large--take out health insurance as well as paying for the NHS. Far from waving VAT forms about, the government should be straining at the leash to offer incentives for everyone or anyone 'to go private'. But a left-winger would rather be burned at the stake.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

This is a general principle that should be applied more widely. For instance, the retail sector is being increasingly hit by shoplifting on a fairly gargantuan scale. This is because the police have a policy of treating the crime as of less importance than others.

This is perfectly proper, shoplifting is a victimless crime so far as the rest of us are concerned, even though we know we have to pay for it in terms of higher prices generally. But it's not victimless so far as shops are concerned and they (or their insurers) would be happy to pay for a police force with the specific remit of returning retail thievery to 'background' levels.

This time both left and right are opposed to any such thing. Apparently we have a rooted objection to 'private armies'. We are perfectly happy to have a single police force of gargantuan inefficiency rather than two, one of which (you may be sure) would be totally on the ball.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Kemi Badenoch: You're welcome to Suella Braverman, she's a right nutter.
Nigel Farage: You've gotta be in this game.
Kemi Badenoch: Any more in the pipeline?
Nigel Farage: That would be telling but put it this way: we're planning on doing one a week till the next election.
Kemi Badenoch: Tell you what, when it's called, I'll leave the sinking ship too, if you promise me the Chancellorship. In writing.
Nigel Farage: Why on earth would I do that?
Kemi Badenoch: Well, since I'll be the last man standing, I can officially abolish the Conservative Party before I leave, you can then change the name of Reform to The Conservative Party, and we can carry on as if nothing has happened since the 1670's.
Nigel Farage: Deal.
Send private message
Wile E. Coyote


In: Arizona
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Slovak National Security Advisor (sic) Miroslav Laják has submitted his resignation to Prime Minister Robert Fico, over revelations in the released Epstein documents.

We don't know what is fact or fiction within these docs.

Still, it was a bad look, Laják appears to have had a particular liking for Russian girls, whilst Laják and Fico now appear pro-Russian. Even Fico's coalition supporters were accusing the Security advisor.... of being a security risk.

If this logic spreads, ie Use of Russian girls +Epstein/Maxwell connection=Security risk, then we are going to see many more resignations, as therir are lots of mentions of Russian girls in the Epstein docs (Andrew was offered a beautiful Russian by Epstein according to another released document).

The Daily Mail has gone full conspiracy on this, ie Epstein/Maxwell were running a KGB honeypot operation.

Wiley doubts it's this simple.

All parties deny all wrongdoing and knowledge of what was happening involved the use of underage or trafficked girls.

We can probably expect more honourable resignations on the basis of "it does look poor, and after much soul searching, I have decided in the interests of my family, party and country to step down....." "please respect my privacy"..... "it was the honour of my life to have served". If the trail of resignations all point to Russia then the Mail might have a case.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Wiley wrote:
Slovak National Security Advisor (sic) Miroslav Laják has submitted his resignation to Prime Minister Robert Fico, over revelations in the released Epstein, documents.

Where are you getting this? I'm still on the first million.

We don't know what is fact or fiction within these docs.

Actually they are quite 'authentic' in the sense of being real time, untouched, not-for-publication documents. It's not chopped liver.

Still, it was a bad look, Laják appears to have had a particular liking for Russian girls, whilst Laják and Fico now appear pro-Russian. Even Fico's coalition supporters were accusing the Security advisor.... of being a security risk.

Though how Epstein knows this is, I agree, arguable. But compared to leaked American diplomatic cables it's kosher chopped liver.

If this logic spreads, ie Use of Russian girls +Epstein/Maxwell connection=Security risk then we are going to see many more resignations, as there are lots of mentions of Russian girls in the Epstein docs (Andrew was offered a beautiful Russian by Epstein according to another released document).

I thought, when I heard this, "But Andrew was a single man at the time so what's the big deal if a friend steers somebody his way."

The Daily Mail has gone full conspiracy on this, ie Epstein/Maxwell were running a KGB honeypot operation. Wiley doubts it's this simple.

I find it medium-preposterous. Robert Maxwell might have had some form in this direction but the idea of Jeff'n'Ghis operating in this megasphere is quite out of court. They were pretty low rent.

All parties deny all wrongdoing, and knowledge of what was happening involved the use of underage or trafficked girls.

Watch out for inadvertent bogus lists. 'Use of', 'underage', 'trafficked', 'girls' should not be thrown around with such gay abandon. (Writes Peter Mandelson.)

We can probably expect more honourable resignations on the basis of "it does look poor, and after much soul searching, I have decided in the interest of my family, party and country to step down....." "please respect my privacy"..... "it was the honour of my life to have served".

Kind of like the Panama Tapes and suchlike avalanches. When so many are getting 'the mention' all at the same time, there's bound to be a fair amount of ducking and diving. Then resurfacing when the smoke has cleared (or got denser). But we have to remember all the Big Fish are yesterday's men. Including Trump by the time they get round to him.

If the trail of resignations all point to Russia then the Mail might have a case.

You're our staff Kremlinologist.
Send private message
Wile E. Coyote


In: Arizona
View user's profile
Reply with quote

"But Andrew was a single man at the time so what's the big deal if a friend steers somebody his way."


It's a nothingburger, unless you consider that Andrew is considered by the Security Services to be a known potential risk, based on previous behaviour.

We know this as Andrew had previously forged a close friendship with Chinese businessman Yang Tengbo, who was banned from the UK by the Home Office for engaging in "covert and deceptive activity" on behalf of the Chinese Communist Party. At the Yang Tenbo banning hearing, it was disclosed that the Security services thought Andrew at risk of exploitation because of his trusting nature and his desperate situation regarding his personal finances.
The decision to ban Yang was in part based on this assessment of Andrew, ie Yang could exploit Andrew.

If you consider Andrew's vulnerability, should we be concerned that Epstein was introducing an attractive Russian into Andrew's orbit?

Let's take a look.

"she [is] 26, russian, clevere [sic] beautiful, trustworthy and yes she has your email".


The thinking asks....

Why Russian?
Why is she older?
Why clever?
Why does Epstein encourage a relationship by giving her Andy's email?

MJH says nothing to see, but to someone else this would, if known, probably represent an increase in the risk of exploitation of an already identified vulnerable individual. NB Andrew is perceived as vulnerable in this scenario, not the Russian girl.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

MJH says nothing to see

Not any more. If I get your drift, Andy's a Chinese agent-of-influence spying on the Russians at the behest of the American fixer, Jeffrey Epstein. But he could be a double.

I see now why the British stripped him of his title. It's so he can stand for election to the House of Commons and become Prime Minister in the National Coalition necessary to clear up the mess after Farage's five years of mayhem.

The bloke will deserve a dukedom after that little lot.
Send private message
Hatty
Site Admin

In: Berkshire
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Maxwell allegedly had links to Mossad. Similarly, conspiracy theories about the relationship of Epstein (known to have been in 'business' with Ehud Barak) with the Israeli state abound. Epstein did have links with Israel by helping to broker a security agreement between Israel and Mongolia and setting up a backchannel between Israel and Russia during the Syrian civil war though frankly both he and Ghislaine seem too flaky to have been Mossad operatives.

Epstein's 'Russia link' appears to have been facilitating talks between Barak and Putin over a deal to remove Bashar al-Assad and replace him with a pro-Russian dictator who would also be acceptable to Israel.
Send private message
Wile E. Coyote


In: Arizona
View user's profile
Reply with quote

Mick Harper wrote:
If I get your drift, Andy's a Chinese agent-of-influence spying on the Russians at the behest of the American fixer, Jeffrey Epstein. But he could be a double.


Amusing, but to be clear.......

No, I am saying that Andrew was previously identified as a potential national security risk at a tribunal that banned from the country a Chinese businessman suspected of being a spy. Ths does not mean Andrew was or is an agent. There is no evidence that he has shared state secrets, it's just his poor judgement and behaviours, and personal financial situation consitute an identified risk. If, for example, he was warned off contact by the Security Services (before the tribunal) but had continued to meet this individual (ie he couldn't see any harm in the relationship with this Chinese businessman), this would then have constituted a greater risk, but it still would not have made Andrew an agent or spy.
Send private message
Mick Harper
Site Admin

In: London
View user's profile
Reply with quote

It would be interesting therefore to find out who put Andrew in touch with Epstein. We casually assume all these Top People bump into one another constantly at their various lush watering holes but this really isn't so, not anyway in the case of royal princes.

It's true that Andy became a business ambassador-at-large, and hence of great use to and overlapping Epstein, but Epstein couldn't just ring up and say, "Can I speak to Prince Andrew, please. My name's Jeffrey Epstein."

This may be where Maxwell--father and/or daughter--may have played a part. Conceivably, even Mandelson. It would only take one of them to have links with 'a foreign power' to get the ball rolling.
Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 139, 140, 141 ... 143, 144, 145  Next

Jump to:  
Page 140 of 145

MemberlistThe Library Index  FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group